What is AWS EFS vs S3? The cost structure of EFS is the most straightforward. Bastion Hosts NAT HA, User Pool vs. Cost-wise, S3 charges based on the amount of data stored, the number of requests made, and the data transfer out of AWS while EFS charges based on the. Elastic File System (EFS). Amazon S3. DOWNLOAD NOW. For example Glacier, S3, EFS allocates the storage for you based on your usage, while at. To do this when creating a file system using the console, choose Availability and Durability, and then choose One Zone. 025$ per GB a month for standard storage and 0. Cost. if you were to use 1 TB of EFS Standard Storage for 15 days and 200 GB of EFS Standard Storage for the remaining 16 days of a 31 day month, your total Standard Storage would be 1,000 GB * 15 days * 24 hours/day + 200 GB * 16 days + 24 hours / day = 436800 GB-hours or. Why choose S3 over EFS? They both store files, scale and are replicated. Create an EFS file system using Amazon EFS Quick Create. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is rated 8. S3 Standard for frequently. S3 Infrequently Accessed uses less redundant hardware for storage, and Amazon passes those cost. Media processing (for example video editing, sound design)—EFS provides high data consistency with high throughput and central, shared. The storage layer uses Amazon EFS with both Standard and Infrequent Access storage classes, and Intelligent-tiering enabled. Amazon EFS serves application and user workloads that were traditionally serviced by on-premises NFS protocol-based NAS storage arrays. Amazon's pricing assumes a savings of 50% and reduces the cost of HDD storage in the U. Amazon Elastic File System is cost-effective as you have to pay as low as 0. S3 is an object store, meaning it is a higher layer data storage system, essentially it is a database "blob" storage, storing data in an underlying simple database as an object. It is designed for customers — particularly those in the financial services, healthcare, media and entertainment and public sector — that retain data sets for 7-10 years or longer to meet customer needs and regulatory compliance requirements. 2, while Amazon S3 Glacier is rated 7. S3 is a blob storage, with no structure, no data types, items can't be updated only replaced. When enabled, lifecycle management migrates files that have not been accessed for a set period of time to the EFS Standard–Infrequent Access (Standard-IA) or One Zone–Infrequent Access (One Zone-IA) storage class, depending on your file system. You can mount an Amazon EFS file system in your virtual private cloud (VPC), through the Network. Can be accessed concurrently by multiple Amazon EC2 instances, allowing them to share data. If you turn on EFS Lifecycle Management then the effective cost can drop, but there are a lot of assumption in that price. Once we add up all the costs, it starts to creep into the range of thousands of dollars per TB per month. EBS: Hardly scalable. One last note, these settings may be enough for many WordPress installations but in some cases, you have to optimize further. Here are the breakdowns for each option. East Region, you can achieve a storage price of $0. You can use AWS Transfer Family and AWS DataSync to transfer data into and out of your Amazon EFS file systems. The estimation factors in typical data compression savings of 50%, and provisions the persistent file system with 1,200 GB of storage capacity and per unit storage throughput of 50 MB/s/TiB. But it’s worth considering the cost of EFS (GB/month, no bandwidth and request charges) vs S3 (bandwidth, request and GB/month) for your specific workload. Can concurrently connect 1 to 1000s of EC2 instances, from. FSx for Lustre has a native file system interface and functions with the Linux operating system. S3 Glacier Deep. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is ranked 3rd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 5 reviews while Microsoft Azure File Storage is ranked 1st in Public Cloud Storage Services with 31 reviews. S3 provides seemingly unlimited storage that can be scaled effortlessly. Cost-Effective Storage Options: The company’s game assets vary in terms. 6. over 500 TB-Month 0. AWS storage types across file, block and object-- including Simple Storage Service (S3), FSx, Elastic File System (EFS) and Elastic Block Store (EBS) -- vary sharply by features, management and performance. Glacier has a very low storage cost, but a higher. EFS is an elastic serverless file system that users can share across multiple resources and systems, whether that's. Amazon S3 looks the cheapest but that might not always be the case. AWS Data Storage Service Offerings. 3/Month. Use AWS DataSync to migrate existing data to Amazon S3, and then use the File Gateway configuration of AWS Storage Gateway to retain access to the migrated data and. The cost structure of EFS is the most straightforward. This would total $253 per month. It is mainly used for data that should be quickly accessible and requires long term durability. is EBS or EFS a reliable way to store huge media files?Additionally, EFS volumes are POSIX compatible, which means they will interoperate with legacy systems. If it can collect a file from EFS and put into S3 in deep archive class then the job is done, cheaply. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is ranked 3rd in Public Cloud Storage Services with 5 reviews while Amazon S3 Glacier is ranked 6th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 11 reviews. See data transfer out pricing for AWS Snowball and AWS Snowball Edge. 2 Use cases 3 Amazon EFS 3. AWS S3 and AWS RDS are completely different storage services for specific use cases. Storage cost is based on the average storage used through the month. is an object store with a simple key, value store design, and good at storing vast numbers of backups or user files. East (Ohio) region to $0. It is used to provide the block-level storage volumes for the use of EC2 instances. 3. Depending on your needs, EFS offers two storage classes: Infrequent Access and Standard Access. It’s hard to make EFS cheaper than S3. For performance, Amazon EBS is the fastest due to high IOPS, but when it comes to shared. It depends on your specific use-cases and softwares but here's some basic guideline. S3 Standard Storage. Amazon EFS vs. After caching is enabled, there is a 5x improvement when serving static assets stored on Amazon EFS. It is calculated by the data copied TO and FROM S3 and EFS, which is US$0. 021-0. S3/EBS/EFS and Azure Storage. Amazon S3 Standard. AWS EBS recover data from EBS. 045-0. More detail about. Logging and Monitoring in Amazon S3. In the AWS platform, cloud storage is primarily broken down into three services: Simple Storage Service (S3). A. AWS FSx for Lustre vs EFS: Head to Head FSx for Lustre is an entirely managed service that offers high-performance, scalable, cost-effective storage for compute workloads. In this blog post, I explain the differences between these options, and discuss. 01 per GB for data transfer in and $0. 04/GB. 30 per hour (and charged by hour) Data. So in my scenario, I will copy 10TB of data to S3 and assume that I will copy 10TB out as well, the total cost not including S3 would be. The other most popular file storage services provided by AWS are EBS and S3. Single part upload: This is the standard way to upload the files to s3. EFS is a file system. Offers cost-saving storage classes ideal for infrequently access data or for data archival; provides unlimited storage There are two types of ML inferencing architectures, single model and multi-model. You can also use a shared EFS file system to share other types of data, such as configuration files or even the state of circuit breakers. EFS Standard tier storage costs $0. EBS is block, EFS is file, S3 is object. How is the answer - "Cost of test file storage on S3 Standard < Cost of test file storage on EFS < Cost of test file storage on EBS". 025$ per GB a month for standard storage and 0. AWS EFS vs other NFS storage Hey guys, I hope you guys are all well and safe from covid. AWS EBS: Which one should you use? Interface: S3 provides you with a web interface while EBS provides a file system interface and EFS provides a web and file system interface. Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) is a set-and-forget, serverless, simple elastic file system that can be used with on-premises resources and AWS Cloud services. Amazon EFS operates on a simple pricing model, charging $0. Before we can get into the direct comparison of Amazon S3 vs. However, there are various other pricing parameters in S3, including cost per number of requests made, S3 Analytics, and data transfer out of S3 per gigabyte. There are several interesting aspects in terms of pricing. SSD pricing starts at $0. SC1 HDD → Lowest cost per GB of all EBS volume types. EFS provides a file system interface, file system access semantics (such as strong consistency and file locking), and concurrently accessible storage for up to thousands of EC2 instances. You can preserve the EC2…Amazon EC2 also has a variety of features that allows it to function better in conjunction with other AWS services. Finally, Amazon S3 is an object store good at storing vast numbers of backups or user files. Sure, there’s a deeper price comparison between Amazon EFS and EBS: Amazon EFS pricing: Standard storage: $0. Finally, Amazon S3 is an object store good at storing vast numbers of backups or user files. Cost of backup evaluations = 3000 backup evaluations x ($1. It would cost an additional $30 per month for the provisioned I/O, after accounting for the 5 Mbps of throughput -- at 50 Kbps per GB of. 04. Share. You’ll also want to consider compression schemes. Using an EFS file system, you can configure instances to mount the file system. offers pay for the storage you actually use. Think of a computer’s hard drive. 30 per GB-month; Infrequent access storage: $0. Now you are able to share the folders located on Amazon S3 as you would with any other Nextcloud folders. Scalability: Amazon S3 and EFS are highly scalable while EBS is hardly scalable. It supports file locking and offers the ability to view changes (read data) after you make such changes (write data). Data in EFS is accessed via file paths. Both solutions are designed to deliver high performance, however, when choosing to use network file systems consider the access patterns. 1755 per GB. AWS EFS is a file storage service for Amazon EC2 instances while EBS is a block-level storage service. Updated: September 2023. $0. Storage class for automatically optimizing data with changing or unknown access patterns. Back in 2016, we first launched File Gateway, a gateway type of the hybrid cloud storage service AWS Storage Gateway. Cost to use DataSync for each incremental copy of 10 TB of 16 MB files into S3 in the US East (Ohio) Region, assuming 500 LIST requests and one HEAD request per object in S3: (10 TB copied into S3 using DataSync * 1024 GB * $0. 01 per GB for data transfer outAmazon EFS is designed to be highly durable and highly available. EFS follows a pay-as-you-go model, while FSx pricing hinges on type and capacity. 10 for EBS vs $0. Securely and reliably access your files with a fully managed file system designed for 99. While the maximum size of an EBS volume can be up to 16 TB, EFS volume sizes are practically unlimited. 02 = $0. offers pay for the storage you actually use. + IOPS costs; EFS: $0. Amazon EFS. Reference the S3 developer guide for technical details on Data Retrievals. However, for external storage, sharing files and folders is deactivated by default. EFS is a file storage service for use with Amazon compute (EC2, containers, serverless) and on-premises servers. Anything over 500 TB is charged at $0. Amazon offers two standard classes of file system storage in EFS: Standard and Infrequent Access storage class (EFS Standard-IA). In this example, the table above shows that Amazon EFS is less than half the cost of a self-managed cloud solution with third-party software. EBS vs EFS – Pricing. Block Storage with NetApp Cloud Solutions. For example, transitioning data from S3 Standard to S3 Standard-Infrequent Access will be charged $0. You can also pay lucid directly 20 bucks per terabyte to store in wasabi. As per the title of this question, what are the practical differences between AWS EFS, EBS and S3? My understanding of each:. 0004 per 1,000 requests for S3 GET requests invoked by Lambda functions. Alternatively, you might need to build key-value or blob/object storage system depending on the level of structure and retrieval you need. One allows you to run servers in the cloud with minimal effort on your part, while the other is designed for storing large amounts of static data and ideal for data backups. 8. 1. EBS: high performance, per-instance block storage EBS used to be accessible to a single EC2 instance only, making it most like your physical hard drive. Performance: AWS file storage solutions are optimized for performance and can deliver high throughput and low-latency access to data, making. 022, saving you a dollar per TB. EFS, EBS, and S3 are AWS’ three different storage types that are applicable for different types of workload needs. S3 offers the option to store a virtually unlimited number of files in a bucket and you won’t ever run out of disk space. AWS offers a complete range of services for you to store, access, govern, and analyze your data to reduce costs, increase agility, and accelerate innovation. The usage conditions for the Amazon S3 Intelligent-Tiering storage class are updated. ) Block storage for an EC2 instance:741,611 professionals have used our research since 2012. 0133$ per GB a month for one-zone storage. EBS, EFS, FSx, and S3 are all storage solutions offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS). $0. Files stored within an S3 bucket can be accessed programmatically or directly from services such as AWS CloudFront. 5,500ms for 400MB files. 023/GB/month for the first 50 Terabytes; this decreases as you consume more Terabytes of storage. Amazon S3 . EBS is a high-performance per-instance block storage system designed to act as storage for a single EC2 instance (most of the time) EFS is a highly scalable file storage system designed to provide flexible storage for multiple EC2 instances. However, choosing a storage option is not easy since each of them has unique features. It is ideal if many services need to access the same data at the same time. Yet despite these differences, Amazon EC2 and Amazon S3 complement each other in significant ways. Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) provides scalable network file systems for use with EC2 instances. EFSThis example estimates the cost of storing 2,000 GB of data on a file system with at least 50 MB/s of throughput capacity in the US East (N. For example, if you list the objects in an S3 bucket, the console shows the storage class for all the objects in the list. So, if your code needs the files locally, the EFS would be a better choice. 1 for SSD storage. 3/Month; Further storage options, which may be used for temporary storing data while/before processing it:. Another low-redundancy option of this storage class is Amazon S3 Reduced Redundancy Storage, or RRS. 1)For Video streaming am planning to use Nodejs and S3 but the point is, if a video is 1. 6. Amazon S3 is a highly-scalable, durable, and secure object storage service that is. Các tệp được lưu trữ trong S3 bucket có. if you were to use 1 TB of EFS Standard Storage for 15 days and 200 GB of EFS Standard Storage for the remaining 16 days of a 31 day month, your total Standard Storage would be 1,000 GB * 15 days * 24 hours/day + 200 GB * 16 days + 24 hours / day =. The distributed design of Amazon EFS avoids the. S3 is also much better for public files like images, videos, HTML/CSS files, and other web resources that are. Continuous replication of data has the advantage of being the shortest. For Configure source location, select Create a new location. In the AWS platform, cloud storage is primarily broken down into three services: Simple Storage Service (S3). Conclusion. Step 3: Allow the EC2 security group to access EFS. You could have 5-10 copies of something before s3 cost more than EFS. 08 = $3. The key difference is that EBS is elastic (easily scalable and extensible) compared to a. EBS is a high-performance per-instance block storage system designed to act as storage for a single EC2 instance (most of the time) EFS is a highly scalable file storage system designed to provide flexible storage for multiple EC2 instances. S3 vs EBS vs EFS. $0. The new S3 Infrequently Accessed allows you to reduce cloud costs further without sacrificing recovery time. Like other cloud storage options, EFS requires balancing convenience with cost. Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) Agile. S3 organizes data in a hierarchy with metadata and it allows to run more complex queries on objects compared to EBS and EFS. The full form of Amazon EFS is Amazon Elastic File System. is an object store with a simple key, value store design, and good at storing vast numbers of backups or user files. The Amazon EFS Standard-Infrequent Access (EFS Standard-IA) and Amazon EFS One Zone-Infrequent Access (EFS One Zone-IA) storage classes are cost-optimized for files accessed less frequently. In your opinion, does it make sense to use Amazon EFS for database backup from a cost perspective? 2. 5. Amazon S3 is a cloud storage service that can be accessed from anywhere. S3 Intelligent-Tiering is the ideal storage class for data with unknown, changing, or unpredictable access patterns, independent of object size or retention period. Networked file systems have inherent tradeoffs over local filesystem access—EFS doesn't change that. Mount the file system on the application instances. Simple Storage Service – S3. Lastly, the cost of AWS DataSync is quite straight forward too. Amazon S3 is a cloud storage service that can be accessed from anywhere. AWS EBS: Which one should you use?Traditional storage services have become extinct as cloud storage services come into the picture. 30 * 24 hours * 30 days = $216. Don't know why you thought using S3 directly would be cheaper. $0. LifecyclePolicy. Lower latency than S3; Highest cost of the three; Share. 023/Month: $0. Time protocol is enabled on your endpoint. What is the difference between EBS vs EFS vs S3? The cost structure of EFS is the most straightforward. 6, while Amazon S3 Glacier is rated 7. Enter the amount of EFS storage capacity you expect to use. 4) Amazon S3 vs DynamoDB: Usefulness. 0125 per GB-month for the EBS Snapshots Archive storage, you are charged $2. EBS is block-level storage designed for Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) instances. S3: Not limited to access from EC2 but S3 is not a file system. Select from object storage, file storage, and block storage services, backup, and data migration options to build the foundation of your cloud IT environment. In this article, I would discuss i) comparison of model training with EFS vs S3, and ii) steps to migrate from S3 to EFS and use EFS as the input data store for model training on SageMaker. Comparing EFS to another popular Amazon service, Elastic Block. A mazon S3: Amazon S3 storage costs $0. The open source Lustre file system is designed for applications that require fast storage – where you want your storage to keep up with your compute. EFS offers high performance up to 10 GB/sec and 500,000 IOPS. For example, some plugins can be configured to write logs. S3 Intelligent-Tiering for automatic cost savings for data with unknown or changing access patterns. 30 for EFS. Many of these have been resolved over the last couple of. Simple Storage Service – S3. ($0. 742,673 professionals have used our research since 2012. EBS vs. 0. Block storage is a type of storage you use to store data files on Storage Area Networks (SAN) or on cloud platforms. Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) vs. EBS, EFS, FSx, and S3 are all storage solutions offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS). Cuối cùng, Amazon S3 là một kho lưu trữ object rất hiệu quả trong việc lưu trữ số lượng lớn các bản sao lưu hoặc tệp người dùng. 0004 per 1000 GET, SELECT, and other requests. The throughput capacity costs $2. AWS offers the same durability as S3 along with data querying options; Google cold. answered Nov 1,. Since most of you are familiar with S3, I will not talk about it in detail. 20/MBps-month = $18/month. It provides a file system interface, file system access semantics (such as strong consistency and file locking), and concurrently-accessible storage for up to thousands of Amazon EC2 instances. If you store more than 50 TB per month, the next 450 TB will be charged at $0. 04 per gigabyte (GB) transferred. NOTE : if you want to access your data on ebs or efs you would need to spin up an ec2 instance which also add cost. Choosing between AWS S3 and EFS can be confusing. EBS has a lower price per GB-month compared to EFS—$0. 04c/1000 requests. EBS stands for Elastic Block Store and is a block-level storage option for use with […]It's fully atomic, eventually consistent, higher latency than GlusterFS or even NFS. 0025 per 1,000 objects stored. Now, Amazon EFS offers two different storage classes to you, which each offer different levels of performance and cost, these being Standard and Infrequent Access, known as IA. EFS. 0. Create an IAM user with an S3 access policy and copy the IAM credentials to the EC2 instance. Objects in Amazon S3 are associated with a unique identifier (key), so access to them can be obtained through web requests from anywhere. Over 500 TB / month. Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service) is capable of storing several files and backups of the user due to its object storage design. It’s easy to get confused with. 741,611 professionals have used our research since 2012. Amazon Glacier was built for the long term storage and the digital archiving of data, as opposed to frequent utilization. When you create a server in the AWS Transfer Family console, select Amazon EFS as your storage service in the Step 4 section Choose a domain. Amazon S3 is a cloud storage service that can be accessed from anywhere. S3 vs EBS vs EFS Comparison Table. Storage Limit: Scalability: Reliability: SLA: Concurrency: S3: Unlimited storage, file size up to 5TB: Manual:. 04 per gigabyte (GB) transferred. 022, saving you a dollar per TB. Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS), Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3), and Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) are all different storage systems provided by Amazon. S3 is eventually consistent. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Amazon S3: which is better? Base your decision on 54 verified in-depth peer reviews and ratings, pros & cons, pricing, support and more. S3 Standard is designed for more than 99. The cost of using the AWS EFS Infrequent Access tier storage is drastically lower—$0. 025 per GB per month. 64. stores such as Amazon S3 are typically significantly more affordable than file-based storage platforms such as Amazon EFS. But if you code can handle S3 (download from it, use the files, upload the results), then S3 is a better option. 05 per GB per month. offers pay for the. 5% availability over a given year; Amazon S3 Glacier: Low-cost storage class ideal for data archiving; Data is not available for real-time access;. Bash. However, this is slow compared to relational databases and S3. EFS vs EBS Multi-Attach features. Although this storage has the same availability SLA of 99. S3 Replication is the only method that preserves the last-modified system metadata property from the source object to the destination object. Example: How Alpha Vertex uses EFS. AWS currently offers the following storage services: Instance/Ephemeral Storage. Amazon EFS and Amazon FSx can be mounted onto. In terms of security, both AWS EFS and Azure File Storage offer robust security measures. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System): A fully managed, elastic, and scalable Network File System (NFS) that supports the NFSv4 protocol. Think photos. EFS Intelligent-Tiering is designed to help you achieve the right price and performance blend for your application file data by. The number of GET requests to S3 will increase so your S3 cost will increase as well. News, articles and tools covering Amazon Web Services (AWS), including S3, EC2, SQS, RDS, DynamoDB, IAM, CloudFormation, AWS-CDK, Route 53, CloudFront, Lambda, VPC, Cloudwatch, Glacier and more. $0. This choice is typically based on your familiarity with a given file system or on matching the file system's feature sets, performance profiles, and data management capabilities to the. EBS (or it's LAN-like equivalent EFS) is the only choice (out of the 2 being explored) if your file is going to be frequently updated (e. EFS provides a file system interface, file system access semantics (such as strong consistency and file locking), and concurrently. More importantly, it charges you per-transaction; Every GET, PUT, DELETE, etc. AWS Snapshots: Storage Costs. Let's break it d. . Alternatively, you might need to build key-value or blob/object storage system depending on the level of structure and retrieval you need. 20. Amazon S3: Amazon EBS: Amazon EFS: Storage Cost (US-East, for example) Amazon S3 pricing:. EFS vs S3. 742,763 professionals have used our research since 2012. EBS vs EFs vs FSx vs S3 for feeding data to a distributed machine learning model? 0. For multiple small files, EFS performance might get degraded. It barely beats a single io2 Block Express EBS volume (5GB/sec EFS vs. AWS provides three ways to protect your data at rest in S3 using server-side encryption: SSE-S3 (default) SSE with customer provided keys (SSE-C) SSE with AWS KMS (SSE-KMS) SSE-S3 encrypts data at. Given the hidden compute and support costs, security integration, and performance issues, S3 as a data platform for RDBMS-sourced, frequently-refreshed data is a far cry from its $23/TB/month promise. Usecases: Whenever we have thousands of instances who needs to process file simultaneously EFS. 6, while Amazon. Cost is a key parameter to consider if you are considering migrating to Google Cloud or switching to any other different cloud provider. Amazon S3 vs EBS vs EFS. S3 Glacier Deep Archive: The lowest-cost storage class for long-term data archiving, with the longest retrieval times. · DevOps Explore the AWS storage options: Elastic Block Storage (EBS), Elastic File System (EFS), and Simple Storage Service (S3). Amazon Elastic File System costs. AWS EFS is also called AWS Elastic File System. 025 per GB-month. That said, increasing the costs over S3 by 10x the price for maybe 2-3 times the overall performance is a pretty tough sell. In this article, I would discuss i) comparison of model training with EFS vs S3, and ii) steps to migrate from S3 to EFS and use EFS as the input data store for model training on SageMaker. For more information about. Amazon EFS replication Use EFS Replication. The question is asking the most cost-efficient storage option, which should be Glacier. That same amount of S3 storage would cost $47. ”. Performance: AWS file storage solutions are optimized for performance and can deliver high throughput and low-latency access to data, making them ideal for. S3 doesn't immediately guarantee consistency. 03. Pros and Cons. When copying data to Amazon S3, DataSync automatically converts each file to a single S3 object in a 1:1 relationship, and preserves POSIX metadata from NFS shares or HDFS as Amazon S3 object metadata. 99% (as compared to Eleven 9s in Standard). Chose Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service) S3 and EBS/EFS both host files, but they are very different. ถาม: เมื่อใดที่ฉันควรเลือกใช้ระหว่าง Amazon EFS กับ Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) หรือ Amazon S3. 01 per 1,000 requests. S3 Glacier is a cost-effective solution for archiving and one of the best in the market today. The EFS Standard storage class is currently charged at $0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Amazon S3 writes "Deploys in minutes, easily scalable, and extremely stable". US East (Ohio) Within your first 12 months on AWS, you can use up to 5 GB/month on the EFS Standard storage class at no charge. 99% (as compared to Eleven 9s in Standard). S3/EBS/EFS and Azure Storage. S3 Standard IA. AWS S3 vs EBS vs EFS Feature Comparison. Cost $368. Create a bucket policy to make the objects in the S3 bucket public. S3 vs EBS vs EFS Comparision. A MySQL instance with the cheapest instance type costs about 0. 5X faster than EFS in the fastest burst mode. However, interesting difference is between EFS and S3, and to identify proper use cases for it. And S3 would be an alternate solution if you want to download/upload the files/objects with different clients platforms like Android, iOS, Web etc. S3 most likely comes down to how much you are ready to pay for storage. Using EFS Lifecycle Management, you can automatically move. AWS EFS vs EBS vs S3 (differences & when to use?) Asked Apr 11 '15 at 08:43. Cloud File System - AWS EFS. 20 = $217. The full form of Amazon EBS is Amazon Elastic Block Store. Automatically scales as you add or remove files, with no need to provision storage capacity in advance.